Legal ratification in the workplace is needed to counter bait effort or machiavellianism.
There is a growing concern in relevance to complaints and informal accusations made, thus to fabricate or tarnish reputations and being associated to personnel files.
Employers often set rules regarding how their employees are expected to dress in the workplace.
Employers should ensure that any dress code they propose does not amount to discrimination.
The rules regarding dress could be discriminatory, if an employer puts in place a dress code that appears to single out some employees for different treatment, because of their background or certain personal characteristics or disadvantages.
Example:
If the employer’s dress code requires a female employee to wear revealing clothing, but does not apply to the male employee. This could be sex discrimination.
The requirement is not reasonable in the circumstances, it could be discrimination.
Males are targeted with sexual activity that could be discrimination, through effort of bait or baiting and use of psychological abuse to either label or find negligible (entrapment).
V-line / neck outfits that display boobs or cleavage in business maybe desirable or tantalising to bait, torment or tease with the sight or promise of something, that is unobtainable.
This can excite the hormone senses or desires of someone and remove focus.
One can see selected people are playing on the odds and idea, a gamble not always won. Thus are opportunist effort of prejudice affairs.
Proper people of society are offended by the concept image within the workplace.
We need to think for one moment here, about what is right for isolated people in the workplace, unwary or unsure about negotiating a female and become easy prey.
Why is an informal proclaim of harassment made? It’s unlike a female to not claim sexual harassment, when being harassed sexually in modern time.
Thus all the hype and promotion of females winning cases would gesture the idea in percentage, unless there is a lie to be had with some truth of the matter, to evade reprisal or accountability of claim, if or when found-out.
Note: You are legally accountable, when the proclaim is exposed in formal surroundings.
Visual exposure of the chest / cleavage is seen as inappropriate to code of conduct.
Polo shirts or no more than two top buttons undone is desirable and acceptable, such with exception of surf life saving and the entertainment industry.
It would be discrimination, if comments were made about attire, or the dress code promotes and or discriminates a gender.
Equality is required for remedy to the dress code of conduct.
Employees have a legal recourse, when discriminated or victimised for personal ethics, through effort of baiting (machiavellianism) or promotion of sexual activity within the workplace.
Brett Hutton
== Relevant Links ==
This conduct was unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature in relation to you, that a reasonable person having regard to all the circumstances would have anticipated would cause you to be offended, humiliated or intimidated (section 28A).
Protonumus 